| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Querns wrote: This data is a massive advantage to those groups who wish to hunt people in wormhole space. Groups only looking for PvE or who lack sufficient PvP force in wormhole space don't have an API for determining whether or not the conne...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.05.06 20:00:00
|
2. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Querns wrote: Sure, but it does remove the need to actually be in the system to observe behavior and make a manual determination of whether the hole should be kept or just rolled. All that needs to be done, today, is to check the system agains...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.05.06 19:54:00
|
3. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nightingale Actault wrote: I would just like to point out, for those who are stating that we don't have any other way to tell what kind of PvE activity is occuring in a WH without access to the NPC kills in question, that you can in fact make a...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.05.06 19:41:00
|
4. Sticky:EVE API and Public CREST discussion - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Andski wrote: "My targets should be deafblind sheep to my wolves. Let me tell you how much I hate free intel unless it provides me with a benefit" Well, that is EvE Online for you little boy, don't like it? Don't play it. What sort of intel...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.05.06 16:35:00
|
5. Sticky:EVE API and Public CREST discussion - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
CCP Prism X wrote: I repeat: This is not data you have access to except through the API. Hence it should not be in the API. This goes for all data returned from it. The API is allowed to make your life easier, but it's not allowed to expose i...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.05.06 16:29:00
|
6. Sticky:EVE API and Public CREST discussion - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Querns wrote: CCP can't "sneak in" changes; they have a DEV POSTS tracker at the top of the page that alerts every single person to their posts. Also, you can still monitor your neighbors for activity without the API. It will just be more dif...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.05.06 16:19:00
|
7. Sticky:EVE API and Public CREST discussion - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: So lets answer a few questions: Your software relying on it is basically why we are doing this. This is information that you guys using software outside the game get a huge advantage over those who do not. CCP by design speci...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.05.06 15:31:00
|
8. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Gustava Risalo wrote: Last time I looked at the VoC killboard you all had plenty of kills some from nullsec, some for lowsec and some from w-space. The claim has been made that the instant spawning of a k-162 is hampering the pvp in w-space s...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.25 04:23:00
|
9. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Erasmus Phoenix wrote: Just because Eve is different from other MMOs doesn't mean you get to say "You guys have to adapt to the game being how I want it" There is a balance to be found and making it impossible for the defending party to get in...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.25 04:19:00
|
10. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Gustava Risalo wrote: Listen up chucklefuck, I have heard this same kind of bs from many players in the years i have been playing eve. It is always the same. Local too strong can't warp in fast enough. Noobscanner saves them. Oh god they are u...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.25 01:53:00
|
11. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Stampede McNabb wrote: Gnaw LF wrote: First, I will continue using the condescending tone to you since you have problems comprehending the basic design principles behind EvE. Second, there is nothing wrong with being the aggressor, thats w...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.25 01:45:00
|
12. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
na'Vi Ronuken wrote: Yo - if they had dreads logged off in the system it would be on the site with them to make the site running faster. so YES you can say with a high degree of certainty how many caps they have and how many people they got. ...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 20:21:00
|
13. Please Vote! Poll on proposed WH scanning changes - in Wormholes [original thread]
ShadowandLight wrote: Poll on proposed changes As noted here, CCP is looking into changing the way WH's are detected in systems. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4378637#post4378637 The short version is they are lo...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 20:16:00
|
14. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Deeone wrote: under the new system u have 5 mins to gather perfect intel b4 they even know your there yeah totally balanced. Get rid of the stupid discovery changes and give us back the balanced system we had b4. tbh 70% of the holes I used to ...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 16:48:00
|
15. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Stitcher wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: We investigated what would be involved with delaying the appearance of signatures on the sensor overlay, but that solution is somewhat unsatisfactory since players could always return to the old trick of spa...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 15:56:00
|
16. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Gustava Risalo wrote: There is one inherent problem with all of this hurf blurf about Risk vs reward. You gain the ability to roll holes unannounced until you find a nice target you can kill then you have the suprise factor on your side for kil...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 15:45:00
|
17. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Tyrant Scorn wrote: Gnaw LF wrote: Funny, because you dismissed my entire post just because I happen to be an agressor. Don't worry my little scrub peon, you are not alone in your hypocrisy,. Your condescending tone made me dismiss every...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 03:44:00
|
18. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Tyrant Scorn wrote: Gnaw LF wrote: Tyrant Scorn wrote: Don't use your condescending tone... You're only trying to make this point because you're the aggressor. First, I will continue using the condescending tone to you since you have...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 03:34:00
|
19. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Joan Greywind wrote: I really liked the idea that was proposed earlier in the thread of some other form of ESS being employed in WH space. The idea is to pay for the "safety" you are awarded now. You either can choose to have 80% of blue loo...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 03:32:00
|
20. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Tyrant Scorn wrote: Don't use your condescending tone... You're only trying to make this point because you're the aggressor. First, I will continue using the condescending tone to you since you have problems comprehending the basic design ...
- by Gnaw LF - at 2014.03.24 03:28:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |